One thought

  1. What he says is correct, there are much better Christian philosophers out there. But he is overlooking the fact that their books are for the scholarly people, not for ordinary people. I think Ravi’s audience was different, and unlike these scholars who write books and argue with other scholars, Ravi’s mission was different – he took his message across the globe to a large group of people. Apostle Paul’s arguments are not that scholarly either, he took his message to ordinary groups of people. If the allegations are true, I think Ravi had some moral issues, but that should not affect the message as long as he was not advocating anything immoral in the message itself.

Leave a Reply